Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
January 16, 2013 · 3-team trade

WSNOAKSEA

WSN won this trade +$12.0M surplus WSN won this trade +2.6 WAR
WSNWSN Michael Rizzo net +$12.0M net +2.6
received +$13.6M+$13.6M ± $100M expected surplus · +$6.4M realized received 5.4 ± 12 expected · 1.9 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved WSN's 2013 odds 17% → 18% (+1.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
A. J. Cole#57P·21y·R/R
+$10.4M+$10.4M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$0.8M 3.0± 7 exp WARrealized 0.3
Prior
BA #57 prospect (2012) → 0.54/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.54/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Blake TreinenP·25y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$8.0M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized 1.9
Prior
#226 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Ian KrolP·22y·L/L
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized -0.3
Prior
#213 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
OAKOAK Billy Beane net −$6.4M net -0.7
received +$8.0M+$8.0M ± $23M expected surplus · +$0.0M realized received 2.2 ± 3 expected · 1.2 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved OAK's 2013 odds 51% → 56% (+5.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
John JasoC·30y·L/R
+$8.0M+$8.0M± $23M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 2.2± 3 exp WARrealized 1.2
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.4/yr over 1.6 season
Talent
0.86/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs × 0.87 age decline
SEASEA Jack Zduriencik net −$5.6M net -1.9
received +$3.2M+$3.2M ± $12M expected surplus · −$5.6M realized received 1.1 ± 2 expected · -0.7 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SEA's 2013 odds 4% → 3% (-0.9 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Mike Morse1B/OF·31y·R/R
+$3.2M+$3.2M± $12M exp surplusrealized −$5.6M 1.1± 2 exp WARrealized -0.7
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.7/yr over 1.7 season
Talent
1.10/yr blended
Horizon
1.0 control yr

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →