Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
January 19, 2021 · 3-team trade

SDPNYMPIT

NYM won this trade +$1.6M surplus SDP won this trade +2.3 WAR
SDPSDP AJ Preller net −$0.8M net +2.3
received −$48.0M+$16.8M ± $40M expected surplus · +$23.2M realized received 8.2 ± 5 expected · 9.6 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SDP's 2021 odds 18% → 21% (+2.9 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Joe MusgroveP·29y·R/R
−$48.0M+$16.8M± $40M exp surplusrealized +$23.2M 8.2± 5 exp WARrealized 9.6
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.3/yr over 2.0 seasons
Talent
1.52/yr blended
Horizon
7.0 control yrs × 0.77 age decline
NYMNYM Jared Porter net +$1.6M net +0.7
received +$11.2M+$11.2M ± $33M expected surplus · +$3.2M realized received 3.0 ± 4 expected · 1.3 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved NYM's 2021 odds 23% → 26% (+2.9 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Joey LucchesiP·28y·L/L
+$11.2M+$11.2M± $33M exp surplusrealized +$3.2M 3.0± 4 exp WARrealized 1.3
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.3/yr over 1.3 season
Talent
0.79/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs × 0.96 age decline
PITPIT Ben Cherington net −$0.8M net -3.0
received +$8.0M+$4.8M ± $126M expected surplus · +$22.4M realized received 5.3 ± 16 expected · 6.6 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved PIT's 2021 odds 0% → 0% (-0.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Hudson HeadCF·20y·L/L
+$4.0M+$2.4M± $62M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 8 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#84 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Drake FellowsP·23y·L/R
+$4.0M+$2.4M± $62M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 8 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#173 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Endy RodríguezC·21y·S/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$1.6M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized 0.6
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Omar CruzP·22y·L/L
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
David BednarP·27y·L/R
−$3.2M−$3.2M± $36M exp surplusrealized +$20.8M 0.3± 4 exp WARrealized 6.0
Prior
#1044 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.1/yr over 0.8 season
Talent
0.09/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.73 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →