Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
November 18, 2016

TBRSEA

TBR won this trade +$9.6M surplus TBR won this trade +2.7 WAR
TBRTBR Matt Silverman net +$9.6M net +2.7
received +$4.0M+$2.4M ± $78M expected surplus · +$4.8M realized received 2.4 ± 10 expected · 1.9 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TBR's 2017 odds 15% → 17% (+2.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Dalton Kelly1B·23y·L/L
+$4.0M+$2.4M± $62M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 8 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#1145 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Andrew KittredgeP·27y·R/R
+$0.0M+$0.0M± $46M exp surplusrealized +$4.8M 0.9± 6 exp WARrealized 1.9
Prior
#1360 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.79 age decline
Dylan Thompson
+$0.0M+$0.0M± $12M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)
SEASEA Jerry Dipoto net −$9.6M net -2.7
received +$4.0M+$4.0M ± $58M expected surplus · −$4.8M realized received 2.4 ± 7 expected · -0.8 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SEA's 2017 odds 11% → 10% (-1.6 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Richie Shaffer1B/DH·26y·R/R
+$8.0M+$8.0M± $49M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 2.3± 6 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#25 overall draft pick → 0.39/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.7/yr over 0.3 season
Talent
0.45/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
Taylor MotterSS·28y·R/R
−$4.0M−$4.0M± $32M exp surplusrealized −$4.8M 0.1± 4 exp WARrealized -0.8
Prior
#540 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -1.0/yr over 0.2 season
Talent
0.02/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.55 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →