Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
December 10, 2013 · 3-team trade

CHWANAARI

CHW won this trade +$122.4M surplus CHW won this trade +11.8 WAR
CHWCHW Kenny Williams net +$122.4M net +11.8
received +$12.8M+$12.8M ± $50M expected surplus · +$125.6M realized received 3.4 ± 6 expected · 13.7 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CHW's 2014 odds 1% → 2% (+1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Adam EatonOF·26y·L/L
+$12.8M+$12.8M± $50M exp surplusrealized +$125.6M 3.4± 6 exp WARrealized 13.7
Prior
#571 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.6/yr over 0.5 season
Talent
0.63/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.99 age decline
ANAANA Jerry Dipoto net +$48.8M net +9.4
received +$21.6M+$21.6M ± $58M expected surplus · +$34.4M realized received 5.8 ± 7 expected · 9.3 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved ANA's 2014 odds 58% → 71% (+13.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Tyler SkaggsP·23y·L/L
+$14.4M+$14.4M± $48M exp surplusrealized +$31.2M 3.8± 6 exp WARrealized 7.4
Prior
BA #12 pedigree (2013) → 1.22/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.2/yr over 0.7 season
Talent
0.69/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Héctor SantiagoP·27y·R/L
+$7.2M+$7.2M± $32M exp surplusrealized +$3.2M 2.0± 4 exp WARrealized 1.9
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.7/yr over 1.7 season
Talent
0.49/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
ARIARI Kevin Towers net −$171.2M net -21.2
received +$23.2M+$19.2M ± $89M expected surplus · −$14.4M realized received 6.6 ± 11 expected · -0.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved ARI's 2014 odds 3% → 1% (-2.4 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Mark Trumbo1B/DH/OF·28y·R/R
+$15.2M+$15.2M± $25M exp surplusrealized −$13.6M 4.1± 3 exp WARrealized 0.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.0/yr over 2.1 seasons
Talent
1.37/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
Brandon JacobsLF·24y·R/R
+$6.4M+$2.4M± $62M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 8 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#318 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
A. J. SchugelP·25y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized -0.2
Prior
#774 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →