Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
December 11, 2001

SDPSEA

SDP won this trade +$9.6M surplus SDP won this trade +4.9 WAR
SDPSDP Kevin Towers net +$9.6M net +4.9
received −$1.6M−$9.6M ± $54M expected surplus · +$12.8M realized received 1.4 ± 7 expected · 6.8 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SDP's 2002 odds 0% → 1% (+0.6 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Brett TomkoP·29y·R/R
+$3.2M−$4.8M± $15M exp surplusrealized −$8.0M 0.9± 2 exp WARrealized 1.8
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.9/yr over 1.9 season
Talent
0.63/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr
Ramón Vázquez3B/SS·26y·L/R
−$1.6M−$1.6M± $51M exp surplusrealized +$18.4M 0.5± 6 exp WARrealized 3.9
Prior
BA #92 pedigree (2002) → 0.39/yr
Evidence
recent form -3.0/yr over 0.1 season
Talent
0.10/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.91 age decline
Tom LampkinC·38y·L/R
−$3.2M−$3.2M± $0M exp surplusrealized +$2.4M 0.0± 0 exp WARrealized 1.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.6/yr over 1.4 season
Talent
0.96/yr blended
Horizon
0.0 control yr
SEASEA Pat Gillick net −$9.6M net -4.9
received +$14.4M+$12.8M ± $53M expected surplus · +$3.2M realized received 4.3 ± 7 expected · 1.9 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SEA's 2002 odds 95% → 89% (-5.8 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Ben DavisC·25y·B/R
+$10.4M+$10.4M± $26M exp surplusrealized +$3.2M 2.8± 3 exp WARrealized 1.9
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.47/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.4/yr over 1.4 season
Talent
0.95/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
Wascar SerranoP·24y·R/R
+$4.0M+$4.0M± $42M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.5± 5 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
BA #53 pedigree (2001) → 0.47/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.1/yr over 1.0 season
Talent
0.30/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
Alex Arias3B/SS·35y·R/R
+$0.0M−$1.6M± $16M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.0± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.2/yr over 1.5 season
Talent
-0.02/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →