Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
July 31, 2014 · 3-team trade

TBRSEADET

DET won this trade +$4.8M surplus TBR won this trade +2.9 WAR
TBRTBR Andrew Friedman net −$1.6M net +2.9
received +$44.8M+$44.8M ± $85M expected surplus · +$36.8M realized received 12.1 ± 11 expected · 9.2 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TBR's 2014 odds 22% → 17% (-4.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Drew SmylyP·25y·L/L
+$22.4M+$22.4M± $38M exp surplusrealized +$12.0M 5.6± 5 exp WARrealized 4.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.8/yr over 1.6 season
Talent
1.11/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
Nick Franklin2B·23y·B/R
+$20.8M+$20.8M± $49M exp surplusrealized −$3.2M 5.3± 6 exp WARrealized -0.4
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.33/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.1/yr over 0.7 season
Talent
0.97/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Willy AdamesSS·19y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$28.0M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized 5.6
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
SEASEA Jack Zduriencik net −$3.2M net +1.6
received +$42.4M+$42.4M ± $18M expected surplus · −$6.4M realized received 5.3 ± 2 expected · 1.2 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SEA's 2014 odds 8% → 7% (-0.9 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Austin JacksonOF·27y·R/R
+$42.4M+$42.4M± $18M exp surplusrealized −$6.4M 5.3± 2 exp WARrealized 1.2
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 4.0/yr over 2.2 seasons
Talent
2.67/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs
DETDET Dave Dombrowski net +$4.8M net -4.5
received +$46.4M+$46.4M ± $18M expected surplus · +$38.4M realized received 5.8 ± 2 expected · 6.3 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved DET's 2014 odds 55% → 65% (+9.6 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
David PriceP·29y·L/L
+$46.4M+$46.4M± $18M exp surplusrealized +$38.4M 5.8± 2 exp WARrealized 6.3
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.70/yr
Evidence
recent form 4.0/yr over 2.6 seasons
Talent
2.92/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →