Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
February 20, 2018 · 3-team trade

TBRNYYARI

TBR won this trade +$6.4M surplus TBR won this trade +1.5 WAR
TBRTBR Erik Neander net +$6.4M net +1.5
received +$13.6M+$13.6M ± $96M expected surplus · +$2.4M realized received 5.5 ± 12 expected · 1.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TBR's 2018 odds 58% → 60% (+1.9 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Anthony BandaP·25y·L/L
+$10.4M+$10.4M± $50M exp surplusrealized +$0.8M 2.9± 6 exp WARrealized 0.2
Prior
BA #88 pedigree (2017) → 0.39/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.8/yr over 0.5 season
Talent
0.52/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Nick Solak2B·23y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#62 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Colin PocheP·24y·L/L
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$1.6M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized 1.2
Prior
#162 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Sam McWilliams
+$0.0M+$0.0M± $12M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)
NYYNYY Brian Cashman net +$2.4M net +0.3
received +$14.4M+$14.4M ± $33M expected surplus · −$1.6M realized received 3.7 ± 4 expected · -0.3 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved NYY's 2018 odds 94% → 94% (-0.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Brandon Drury2B/3B·26y·R/R
+$14.4M+$14.4M± $33M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 3.7± 4 exp WARrealized -0.3
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.26/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.4/yr over 1.5 season
Talent
0.92/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
ARIARI Mike Hazen net −$8.8M net -1.8
received +$32.0M+$32.0M ± $62M expected surplus · −$8.0M realized received 6.2 ± 8 expected · -0.7 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved ARI's 2018 odds 11% → 11% (-0.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Steven SouzaOF·29y·R/R
+$30.4M+$30.4M± $25M exp surplusrealized −$4.0M 5.0± 3 exp WARrealized -0.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.7/yr over 1.9 season
Talent
1.71/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs × 0.98 age decline
Taylor WidenerP·24y·L/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$4.0M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized -0.6
Prior
#368 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →