Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
December 16, 2015 · 3-team trade

CINCHWLAD

CIN won this trade +$11.2M surplus CIN won this trade +1.9 WAR
CINCIN Walt Jocketty net +$11.2M net +1.9
received +$16.0M+$16.0M ± $98M expected surplus · +$26.4M realized received 5.7 ± 12 expected · 6.2 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CIN's 2016 odds 0% → 0% (-0 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Scott ScheblerOF·26y·L/R
+$8.8M+$8.8M± $54M exp surplusrealized +$12.0M 2.5± 7 exp WARrealized 2.6
Prior
#802 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.9/yr over 0.1 season
Talent
0.46/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.98 age decline
José Peraza2B/SS·22y·R/R
+$5.6M+$5.6M± $57M exp surplusrealized +$16.0M 2.0± 7 exp WARrealized 3.9
Prior
BA #66 pedigree (2016) → 0.46/yr
Evidence
recent form -1.9/yr over 0.0 season
Talent
0.37/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Brandon Dixon1B/OF·24y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized -0.3
Prior
#92 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
CHWCHW Kenny Williams net +$3.2M net +1.5
received +$42.4M+$42.4M ± $18M expected surplus · +$15.2M realized received 5.3 ± 2 expected · 4.3 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CHW's 2016 odds 7% → 12% (+4.8 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Todd Frazier3B·30y·R/R
+$42.4M+$42.4M± $18M exp surplusrealized +$15.2M 5.3± 2 exp WARrealized 4.3
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.22/yr
Evidence
recent form 4.0/yr over 2.4 seasons
Talent
2.70/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs × 0.98 age decline
LADLAD Andrew Friedman net −$14.4M net -3.4
received +$24.0M+$24.0M ± $88M expected surplus · +$12.0M realized received 7.6 ± 11 expected · 2.8 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved LAD's 2016 odds 65% → 57% (-7.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Trayce ThompsonOF·25y·R/R
+$24.0M+$24.0M± $53M exp surplusrealized +$12.8M 6.1± 7 exp WARrealized 2.9
Prior
#61 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 4.8/yr over 0.3 season
Talent
1.12/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Frankie MontasP·23y·R/R
+$3.2M+$3.2M± $50M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.4± 6 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.4/yr over 0.5 season
Talent
0.26/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Micah Johnson2B·26y·L/R
−$3.2M−$3.2M± $50M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 0.1± 6 exp WARrealized -0.1
Prior
#291 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.9/yr over 0.2 season
Talent
0.03/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →