Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
November 11, 1999

STLTOR

STL won this trade +$8.8M surplus STL won this trade +2.4 WAR
STLSTL Walt Jocketty net +$8.8M net +2.4
received +$1.6M−$11.2M ± $21M expected surplus · −$2.4M realized received 2.9 ± 3 expected · 2.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved STL's 2000 odds 66% → 75% (+9.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Pat HentgenP·32y·R/R
+$0.8M−$12.0M± $14M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 2.5± 2 exp WARrealized 2.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.4/yr over 2.7 seasons
Talent
1.70/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.97 age decline
Paul SpoljaricP·30y·R/L
+$0.8M+$0.8M± $15M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.4± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.3/yr over 2.3 seasons
Talent
0.29/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs × 0.76 age decline
TORTOR Gord Ash net −$8.8M net -2.4
received +$6.4M+$6.4M ± $66M expected surplus · −$11.2M realized received 3.8 ± 8 expected · -0.3 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TOR's 2000 odds 24% → 17% (-7.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Alberto CastilloC·30y·R/R
+$8.8M+$8.8M± $28M exp surplusrealized −$4.0M 2.3± 4 exp WARrealized -0.2
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.4/yr over 1.0 season
Talent
0.75/yr blended
Horizon
4.4 control yrs × 0.70 age decline
Matt DeWittP·23y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$3.2M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized -0.4
Prior
#267 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Lance PainterP·33y·L/L
−$4.0M−$4.0M± $13M exp surplusrealized −$4.0M 0.3± 2 exp WARrealized 0.3
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.3/yr over 2.7 seasons
Talent
0.28/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.77 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →