Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
December 11, 2012 · 3-team trade

CLECINARI

CIN won this trade +$66.4M surplus CLE won this trade +14.9 WAR
CLECLE Chris Antonetti net +$20.0M net +14.9
received +$47.2M+$47.2M ± $71M expected surplus · +$92.8M realized received 10.6 ± 9 expected · 21.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CLE's 2013 odds 63% → 41% (-22.7 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Drew StubbsOF·29y·R/R
+$26.4M+$26.4M± $25M exp surplusrealized +$1.6M 4.4± 3 exp WARrealized 1.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.32/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.2/yr over 2.1 seasons
Talent
1.51/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs × 0.98 age decline
Trevor BauerP·22y·R/R
+$21.6M+$21.6M± $54M exp surplusrealized +$95.2M 5.5± 7 exp WARrealized 16.6
Prior
BA #14 pedigree (2013) → 1.32/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.4/yr over 0.3 season
Talent
1.00/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Bryan ShawP·26y·B/R
+$0.0M+$0.0M± $38M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 0.7± 5 exp WARrealized 3.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.1/yr over 1.6 season
Talent
0.13/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
Matt AlbersP·30y·L/R
−$0.8M−$0.8M± $12M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 0.0± 2 exp WARrealized 0.3
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.1/yr over 2.7 seasons
Talent
0.01/yr blended
Horizon
1.0 control yr
CINCIN Walt Jocketty net +$66.4M net +3.5
received +$20.0M+$20.0M ± $28M expected surplus · +$76.0M realized received 3.3 ± 4 expected · 6.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CIN's 2013 odds 24% → 44% (+19.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Shin-Soo ChooOF·31y·L/L
+$20.8M+$20.8M± $12M exp surplusrealized +$76.0M 2.7± 2 exp WARrealized 6.4
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 4.0/yr over 2.2 seasons
Talent
2.67/yr blended
Horizon
1.0 control yr
Jason Donald2B/SS·29y·R/R
−$0.8M−$0.8M± $26M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.6± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.2/yr over 0.7 season
Talent
0.22/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs × 0.52 age decline
ARIARI Kevin Towers net −$86.4M net -18.4
received +$4.0M+$4.0M ± $71M expected surplus · +$4.8M realized received 2.7 ± 9 expected · 1.5 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved ARI's 2013 odds 5% → 5% (+0.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Didi GregoriusSS·23y·L/R
+$8.8M+$8.8M± $57M exp surplusrealized +$8.0M 2.6± 7 exp WARrealized 1.8
Prior
BA #80 pedigree (2013) → 0.43/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.5/yr over 0.1 season
Talent
0.47/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Tony SippP·30y·L/L
−$1.6M−$1.6M± $12M exp surplusrealized −$3.2M 0.1± 2 exp WARrealized -0.3
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.0/yr over 2.3 seasons
Talent
0.06/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs × 0.33 age decline
Lars Anderson1B·26y·L/L
−$3.2M−$3.2M± $42M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.0± 5 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#553 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -2.3/yr over 0.1 season
Talent
-0.01/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →