Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
December 4, 2007

DETMIA

MIA won this trade +$46.4M surplus DET won this trade +44.0 WAR
DETDET Dave Dombrowski net −$46.4M net +44.0
received +$28.8M+$28.8M ± $22M expected surplus · −$41.6M realized received 9.0 ± 3 expected · 48.8 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved DET's 2008 odds 2% → 2% (+0.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Miguel Cabrera1B/3B·25y·R/R
+$15.2M+$15.2M± $15M exp surplusrealized +$15.2M 5.1± 2 exp WARrealized 49.1
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 4.9/yr over 2.5 seasons
Talent
3.37/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr
Dontrelle WillisP·26y·L/L
+$13.6M+$13.6M± $15M exp surplusrealized −$56.8M 3.9± 2 exp WARrealized -0.3
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 3.7/yr over 2.5 seasons
Talent
2.58/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr
MIAMIA Larry Beinfest net +$46.4M net -44.0
received +$35.2M+$32.0M ± $123M expected surplus · +$4.8M realized received 11.5 ± 15 expected · 4.8 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved MIA's 2008 odds 18% → 15% (-3.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Cameron MaybinOF·21y·R/R
+$21.6M+$21.6M± $55M exp surplusrealized +$12.0M 5.4± 7 exp WARrealized 2.9
Prior
BA #6 pedigree (2008) → 1.43/yr
Evidence
recent form -2.4/yr over 0.2 season
Talent
0.97/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Andrew MillerP·23y·L/L
+$8.8M+$8.8M± $34M exp surplusrealized −$4.0M 2.5± 4 exp WARrealized 1.6
Prior
BA #10 pedigree (2007) → 1.15/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.1/yr over 1.2 season
Talent
0.64/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
Dallas TrahernP·23y·R/R
+$5.6M+$2.4M± $62M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 8 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#1003 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Burke BadenhopP·25y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$6.4M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized 1.9
Prior
#570 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Frankie De La CruzP·24y·R/R
+$0.0M+$0.0M± $51M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 0.8± 6 exp WARrealized -0.3
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.1/yr over 0.4 season
Talent
0.14/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Mike RabeloC·28y·B/R
−$2.4M−$2.4M± $32M exp surplusrealized −$7.2M 0.3± 4 exp WARrealized -1.3
Prior
#117 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.2/yr over 0.4 season
Talent
0.11/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs × 0.62 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →