Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
July 21, 1995

CINSFG

CIN won this trade +$4.8M surplus CIN won this trade +6.7 WAR
CINCIN Jim Bowden net +$4.8M net +6.7
received −$8.8M−$8.8M ± $34M expected surplus · −$8.8M realized received 5.0 ± 4 expected · 7.8 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CIN's 1995 odds 77% → 83% (+6.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Darren LewisOF·28y·R/R
+$7.2M+$7.2M± $26M exp surplusrealized −$6.4M 2.1± 3 exp WARrealized 0.5
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.1/yr over 1.8 season
Talent
0.71/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
Dave BurbaP·29y·R/R
+$2.4M+$2.4M± $18M exp surplusrealized +$18.4M 0.7± 2 exp WARrealized 4.6
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.24/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.4/yr over 2.3 seasons
Talent
0.37/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs
Mark PortugalP·33y·R/R
−$18.4M−$18.4M± $14M exp surplusrealized −$20.8M 2.2± 2 exp WARrealized 2.7
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.1/yr over 2.8 seasons
Talent
1.50/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.96 age decline
SFGSFG Bob Quinn net −$4.8M net -6.7
received +$17.6M+$17.6M ± $85M expected surplus · −$13.6M realized received 7.5 ± 11 expected · 1.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SFG's 1995 odds 12% → 8% (-3.4 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Deion SandersOF·28y·L/L
+$16.0M+$16.0M± $26M exp surplusrealized −$9.6M 4.4± 3 exp WARrealized 1.4
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.5/yr over 1.5 season
Talent
1.48/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
John RoperP·24y·R/R
+$4.8M+$4.8M± $32M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 1.6± 4 exp WARrealized -0.0
Prior
BA #36 pedigree (1993) → 0.51/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.3/yr over 1.6 season
Talent
0.39/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
Ricky PickettP·25y·L/L
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#773 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Scott ServiceP·28y·R/R
−$1.6M−$1.6M± $28M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 0.3± 4 exp WARrealized -0.2
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.0/yr over 1.0 season
Talent
0.12/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs × 0.75 age decline
Dave McCarty1B/OF·26y·R/L
−$3.2M−$3.2M± $37M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 0.0± 5 exp WARrealized -0.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.67/yr
Evidence
recent form -3.4/yr over 0.7 season
Talent
-0.85/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →