Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
December 1, 2003

MILARI

MIL won this trade +$56.0M surplus MIL won this trade +18.0 WAR
MILMIL Douglas Melvin net +$56.0M net +18.0
received +$46.4M+$44.0M ± $98M expected surplus · +$37.6M realized received 14.7 ± 12 expected · 18.5 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved MIL's 2004 odds 2% → 5% (+3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Junior Spivey2B·29y·R/R
+$18.4M+$18.4M± $31M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 4.6± 4 exp WARrealized 1.9
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.1/yr over 1.5 season
Talent
1.25/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs × 0.93 age decline
Lyle Overbay1B·27y·L/L
+$12.0M+$12.0M± $44M exp surplusrealized +$18.4M 3.2± 6 exp WARrealized 4.3
Prior
BA #65 pedigree (2003) → 0.35/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.3/yr over 0.6 season
Talent
0.67/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs × 0.97 age decline
Chad MoellerC·29y·R/R
+$9.6M+$9.6M± $34M exp surplusrealized −$15.2M 2.6± 4 exp WARrealized -2.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.3/yr over 0.9 season
Talent
0.67/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs × 0.78 age decline
Chris CapuanoP·26y·L/L
+$4.8M+$4.8M± $46M exp surplusrealized +$32.8M 1.6± 6 exp WARrealized 8.5
Prior
#238 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.5/yr over 0.6 season
Talent
0.32/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
Jorge De La RosaP·23y·L/L
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized 0.2
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Craig Counsell2B/3B/SS·34y·L/R
+$0.0M−$2.4M± $15M exp surplusrealized +$2.4M 1.5± 2 exp WARrealized 5.7
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.7/yr over 1.8 season
Talent
1.09/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.92 age decline
ARIARI Joe Garagiola net −$56.0M net -18.0
received +$20.8M+$4.8M ± $73M expected surplus · −$18.4M realized received 4.6 ± 9 expected · 0.5 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved ARI's 2004 odds 0% → 0% (-0.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Richie Sexson1B·30y·R/R
+$17.6M+$4.8M± $15M exp surplusrealized −$16.0M 3.0± 2 exp WARrealized 0.8
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.9/yr over 2.5 seasons
Talent
2.01/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.98 age decline
Noochie VarnerOF·24y·R/R
+$5.6M+$2.4M± $62M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 8 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#303 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Shane NanceP·27y·L/L
−$2.4M−$2.4M± $34M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 0.3± 4 exp WARrealized -0.3
Prior
#327 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.0/yr over 1.2 season
Talent
0.08/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs × 0.80 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →