Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
December 4, 2019

BALANA

BAL won this trade +$50.4M surplus BAL won this trade +5.9 WAR
BALBAL Mike Elias net +$50.4M net +5.9
received +$9.6M+$8.0M ± $120M expected surplus · +$52.8M realized received 5.0 ± 15 expected · 8.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved BAL's 2020 odds 12% → 4% (-8.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Zach PeekP·22y·R/R
+$3.2M+$2.4M± $62M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 8 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#181 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Kyle BrnovichP·23y·L/R
+$3.2M+$2.4M± $62M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 8 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#241 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Kyle BradishP·24y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$52.8M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized 8.0
Prior
#121 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Isaac MattsonP·25y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized -0.0
Prior
#565 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
ANAANA Billy Eppler net −$50.4M net -5.9
received +$9.6M+$9.6M ± $18M expected surplus · +$2.4M realized received 2.9 ± 2 expected · 2.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved ANA's 2020 odds 6% → 18% (+12.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Dylan BundyP·28y·B/R
+$9.6M+$9.6M± $18M exp surplusrealized +$2.4M 2.9± 2 exp WARrealized 2.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.42/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.0/yr over 2.4 seasons
Talent
1.45/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →