Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
December 6, 2016

MILBOS

MIL won this trade +$52.0M surplus MIL won this trade +7.3 WAR
MILMIL David Stearns net +$52.0M net +7.3
received +$19.2M+$16.8M ± $94M expected surplus · +$46.4M realized received 6.0 ± 12 expected · 6.9 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved MIL's 2017 odds 17% → 39% (+21.7 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Travis Shaw3B·27y·L/R
+$12.8M+$12.8M± $40M exp surplusrealized +$46.4M 3.3± 5 exp WARrealized 6.9
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.1/yr over 1.2 season
Talent
0.68/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs × 0.97 age decline
Josh PenningtonP·22y·R/R
+$4.8M+$2.4M± $62M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 8 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#884 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Mauricio Dubón2B/OF·23y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized -0.0
Prior
#773 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Yeison Coca
+$0.0M+$0.0M± $12M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Unidentified minor-league throw-in — valued at the ~0.2 WAR base rate (most produce nothing)
BOSBOS Dave Dombrowski net −$52.0M net -7.3
received +$5.6M+$5.6M ± $23M expected surplus · −$5.6M realized received 1.6 ± 3 expected · -0.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved BOS's 2017 odds 67% → 39% (-27.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Tyler ThornburgP·29y·R/R
+$5.6M+$5.6M± $23M exp surplusrealized −$5.6M 1.6± 3 exp WARrealized -0.4
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.7/yr over 2.4 seasons
Talent
0.56/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs × 0.92 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →