Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
December 16, 2017

LADATL

ATL won this trade +$2.4M surplus LAD won this trade +0.6 WAR
LADLAD Andrew Friedman net −$2.4M net +0.6
received −$14.4M−$14.4M ± $12M expected surplus · −$1.6M realized received 0.4 ± 2 expected · 2.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved LAD's 2018 odds 94% → 95% (+0.8 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Matt KempOF·34y·R/R
−$14.4M−$14.4M± $12M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 0.4± 2 exp WARrealized 2.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.5/yr over 2.5 seasons
Talent
0.39/yr blended
Horizon
1.0 control yr
ATLATL John Hart net +$2.4M net -0.6
received +$15.2M−$2.4M ± $45M expected surplus · +$0.8M realized received 4.3 ± 6 expected · 1.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved ATL's 2018 odds 45% → 41% (-3.8 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Scott KazmirP·34y·L/L
+$8.8M−$8.0M± $15M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.7± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.27/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.9/yr over 1.7 season
Talent
1.19/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.94 age decline
Adrián González1B·36y·L/L
+$7.2M+$6.4M± $12M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.4± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.31/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.8/yr over 2.3 seasons
Talent
1.28/yr blended
Horizon
1.1 control yr × 0.98 age decline
Brandon McCarthyP·35y·R/R
+$2.4M+$2.4M± $12M exp surplusrealized −$4.0M 1.2± 2 exp WARrealized 0.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.7/yr over 2.3 seasons
Talent
1.19/yr blended
Horizon
1.0 control yr
Charlie Culberson3B/OF·29y·R/R
−$3.2M−$3.2M± $38M exp surplusrealized +$4.8M 0.0± 5 exp WARrealized 1.3
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.6/yr over 0.5 season
Talent
-0.01/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →