Rosternomics
← Trade Database
July 29, 2002

STLPHI

STL won this trade +$103.2M surplus STL won this trade +11.7 WAR
STLSTL Walt Jocketty net +$103.2M net +11.7
received +$29.6M+$29.6M ± $32M expected surplus · +$132.8M realized received 6.5 ± 4 expected · 27.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved STL's 2002 odds 57% → 67% (+10.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Scott Rolen3B·27y·R/R
+$29.2M+$29.2M± $19M exp surplusrealized +$132.8M 5.7± 2 exp WARrealized 27.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 5.6/yr over 2.4 seasons
Talent
3.81/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr
Doug NickleP·27y·R/R
+$0.5M+$0.5M± $26M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.8± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#387 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.1/yr over 0.2 season
Talent
0.19/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs × 0.86 age decline
PHIPHI Ed Wade net −$103.2M net -11.7
received +$68.0M+$68.0M ± $68M expected surplus · +$29.6M realized received 13.2 ± 8 expected · 15.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved PHI's 2002 odds 33% → 24% (-9 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Plácido Polanco2B/3B·26y·R/R
+$62.6M+$62.6M± $32M exp surplusrealized +$44.8M 8.5± 4 exp WARrealized 15.7
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.8/yr over 1.8 season
Talent
2.82/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
Bud SmithP·22y·L/L
+$16.2M+$16.2M± $59M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 4.2± 7 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
Composite #39.0 pedigree (Baseball America #39 (2001)) — fell off 1 list since, regressed → 0.36/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.9/yr over 0.5 season
Talent
0.85/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
Mike TimlinP·36y·R/R
−$11.0M−$11.0M± $7M exp surplusrealized −$15.2M 0.5± 1 exp WARrealized -0.3
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.7/yr over 2.8 seasons
Talent
0.52/yr blended
Horizon
1.1 control yr × 0.96 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.