Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
July 29, 2002

STLPHI

STL won this trade +$123.2M surplus STL won this trade +11.7 WAR
STLSTL Walt Jocketty net +$123.2M net +11.7
received +$34.4M+$34.4M ± $38M expected surplus · +$165.6M realized received 6.3 ± 5 expected · 27.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved STL's 2002 odds 57% → 67% (+10.4 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Scott Rolen3B·27y·R/R
+$36.0M+$36.0M± $15M exp surplusrealized +$165.6M 5.7± 2 exp WARrealized 27.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 5.6/yr over 2.4 seasons
Talent
3.81/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr
Doug NickleP·28y·R/R
−$1.6M−$1.6M± $35M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.6± 4 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#387 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.1/yr over 0.2 season
Talent
0.19/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.60 age decline
PHIPHI Ed Wade net −$123.2M net -11.7
received +$76.0M+$76.0M ± $51M expected surplus · +$42.4M realized received 12.9 ± 6 expected · 15.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved PHI's 2002 odds 33% → 24% (-9 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Plácido Polanco2B/3B·27y·R/R
+$72.0M+$72.0M± $26M exp surplusrealized +$57.6M 8.5± 3 exp WARrealized 15.7
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.8/yr over 1.8 season
Talent
2.82/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
Bud SmithP·23y·L/L
+$15.2M+$15.2M± $42M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 3.9± 5 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
BA #39 pedigree (2001) → 0.58/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.0/yr over 1.0 season
Talent
0.79/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
Mike TimlinP·36y·R/R
−$11.2M−$11.2M± $12M exp surplusrealized −$15.2M 0.5± 2 exp WARrealized -0.3
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.7/yr over 2.8 seasons
Talent
0.52/yr blended
Horizon
1.1 control yr × 0.96 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →