Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
December 28, 1994

SDPHOU

SDP won this trade +$141.6M surplus SDP won this trade +14.8 WAR
SDPSDP Randy Smith net +$141.6M net +14.8
received +$19.2M+$16.0M ± $96M expected surplus · +$113.6M realized received 13.4 ± 12 expected · 23.9 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SDP's 1995 odds 1% → 2% (+1.4 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Ken Caminiti3B·32y·B/R
+$12.0M+$12.0M± $15M exp surplusrealized +$131.2M 4.8± 2 exp WARrealized 17.4
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 3.2/yr over 2.3 seasons
Talent
3.23/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.98 age decline
Andújar CedeñoSS·26y·R/R
+$11.2M+$11.2M± $33M exp surplusrealized −$20.0M 3.0± 4 exp WARrealized -2.4
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.1/yr over 1.6 season
Talent
0.75/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
Sean FeshP·23y·L/L
+$5.6M+$2.4M± $62M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 8 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#1467 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Brian WilliamsP·26y·R/R
+$0.0M+$0.0M± $25M exp surplusrealized +$4.8M 0.4± 3 exp WARrealized 1.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.27/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.1/yr over 2.1 seasons
Talent
0.14/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
Roberto Petagine1B·24y·L/L
−$1.6M−$1.6M± $57M exp surplusrealized +$0.8M 0.5± 7 exp WARrealized 0.3
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -2.5/yr over 0.1 season
Talent
0.10/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Steve FinleyOF·30y·L/L
−$8.0M−$8.0M± $15M exp surplusrealized −$3.2M 3.4± 2 exp WARrealized 7.5
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 3.5/yr over 2.2 seasons
Talent
2.32/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.99 age decline
HOUHOU Bob Watson net −$141.6M net -14.8
received +$8.0M+$8.0M ± $70M expected surplus · −$28.0M realized received 4.8 ± 9 expected · 9.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved HOU's 1995 odds 75% → 52% (-22.9 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Phil PlantierOF·26y·L/R
+$7.2M+$7.2M± $26M exp surplusrealized −$10.4M 2.0± 3 exp WARrealized -0.2
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.0/yr over 1.7 season
Talent
0.66/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
Doug BrocailP·28y·L/R
+$4.0M+$4.0M± $30M exp surplusrealized −$12.0M 1.4± 4 exp WARrealized -0.1
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.5/yr over 1.6 season
Talent
0.39/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs × 0.91 age decline
Derek BellOF·27y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $33M exp surplusrealized +$27.2M 0.8± 4 exp WARrealized 12.2
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.2/yr over 1.6 season
Talent
0.19/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
Pedro MartínezP·27y·L/L
+$0.0M+$0.0M± $32M exp surplusrealized −$3.2M 0.5± 4 exp WARrealized -0.4
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.1/yr over 1.6 season
Talent
0.13/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
Craig Shipley3B/SS·32y·R/R
−$1.6M−$1.6M± $12M exp surplusrealized −$4.8M 0.1± 2 exp WARrealized -0.4
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.0/yr over 1.2 season
Talent
0.08/yr blended
Horizon
3.3 control yrs × 0.30 age decline
Ricky GutiérrezSS·25y·R/R
−$3.2M−$3.2M± $34M exp surplusrealized −$24.8M 0.0± 4 exp WARrealized -2.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.27/yr
Evidence
recent form -1.4/yr over 1.2 season
Talent
-0.57/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →