Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
July 31, 1998

LADWSN

LAD won this trade +$5.6M surplus LAD won this trade +12.9 WAR
LADLAD Tommy Lasorda net +$5.6M net +12.9
received +$52.8M+$52.8M ± $68M expected surplus · −$36.8M realized received 11.3 ± 8 expected · 6.9 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved LAD's 1998 odds 6% → 6% (-0.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Carlos PérezP·27y·L/L
+$28.8M+$28.8M± $26M exp surplusrealized −$29.6M 4.7± 3 exp WARrealized 0.1
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.7/yr over 1.4 season
Talent
1.55/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
Mark Grudzielanek2B/SS·28y·R/R
+$12.0M+$12.0M± $26M exp surplusrealized −$5.6M 3.3± 3 exp WARrealized 6.8
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.7/yr over 1.9 season
Talent
1.09/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
Hiram Bocachica#50OF·22y·R/R
+$12.0M+$12.0M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 3.3± 7 exp WARrealized -0.0
Prior
BA #50 prospect (1997) → 0.60/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.60/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
WSNWSN Jim Beattie net −$5.6M net -12.9
received +$13.6M+$13.6M ± $112M expected surplus · −$42.4M realized received 6.0 ± 14 expected · -6.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved WSN's 1998 odds 2% → 2% (+0 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Wilton Guerrero2B/OF·24y·B/R
+$8.0M+$8.0M± $44M exp surplusrealized −$16.8M 2.3± 6 exp WARrealized -1.9
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.40/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.6/yr over 0.8 season
Talent
0.46/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
Jonny TuckerLF·15y·R/R
+$2.4M+$2.4M± $62M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 8 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#589 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Peter BergeronOF·21y·L/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$24.0M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized -4.0
Prior
#118 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Ted LillyP·22y·L/L
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized -0.1
Prior
#356 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →