Rosternomics
← Trade Database
November 7, 2007

HOUPHI

HOU won this trade +$121.6M surplus HOU won this trade +10.7 WAR
HOUHOU Tal Smith net +$121.6M net +10.7
received +$18.4M+$18.4M ± $57M expected surplus · +$136.0M realized received 4.7 ± 7 expected · 11.9 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved HOU's 2008 odds 22% → 16% (-6 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Michael BournOF·25y·L/R
+$16.5M+$16.5M± $52M exp surplusrealized +$140.8M 3.2± 6 exp WARrealized 11.8
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.3/yr over 0.8 season
Talent
0.64/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
Mike Costanzo1B/DH·24y·L/R
+$1.8M+$1.8M± $22M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.2± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#65 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Geoff GearyP·31y·R/R
+$0.2M+$0.2M± $8M exp surplusrealized −$4.8M 0.3± 1 exp WARrealized 0.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.2/yr over 2.4 seasons
Talent
0.23/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs × 0.66 age decline
PHIPHI Pat Gillick net −$121.6M net -10.7
received −$4.8M−$4.8M ± $23M expected surplus · +$14.4M realized received 2.9 ± 3 expected · 1.2 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved PHI's 2008 odds 71% → 79% (+7.4 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Eric BruntlettSS·30y·R/R
+$4.2M+$4.2M± $18M exp surplusrealized −$7.2M 1.3± 2 exp WARrealized -0.9
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.9/yr over 1.2 season
Talent
0.55/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs × 0.80 age decline
Brad LidgeP·31y·R/R
−$8.6M−$8.6M± $14M exp surplusrealized +$21.6M 1.6± 2 exp WARrealized 2.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.29/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.5/yr over 2.5 seasons
Talent
1.12/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.95 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.