Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
February 6, 1998

MINNYY

MIN won this trade +$95.2M surplus MIN won this trade +11.0 WAR
MINMIN Terry Ryan net +$95.2M net +11.0
received +$27.2M+$27.2M ± $115M expected surplus · +$68.8M realized received 9.2 ± 14 expected · 18.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved MIN's 1998 odds 0% → 0% (-0 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Eric Milton#25P·23y·L/L
+$15.2M+$15.2M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$68.8M 4.1± 7 exp WARrealized 13.4
Prior
BA #25 prospect (1998) → 0.75/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.75/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Brian BuchananOF·25y·R/R
+$8.8M+$8.8M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$3.2M 2.7± 7 exp WARrealized -0.2
Prior
#24 overall draft pick → 0.50/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.50/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Cristian GuzmánSS·20y·B/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$4.0M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized 4.8
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Danny MotaP·23y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized -0.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
NYYNYY Bob Watson net −$95.2M net -11.0
received +$28.8M+$28.8M ± $15M expected surplus · −$26.4M realized received 6.5 ± 2 expected · 7.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved NYY's 1998 odds 97% → 97% (+0.9 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Chuck Knoblauch2B·30y·R/R
+$28.8M+$28.8M± $15M exp surplusrealized −$26.4M 6.5± 2 exp WARrealized 7.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.23/yr
Evidence
recent form 6.3/yr over 2.6 seasons
Talent
4.36/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.99 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →