Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
November 2, 1999

TEXDET

TEX won this trade +$41.6M surplus TEX won this trade +12.9 WAR
TEXTEX Douglas Melvin net +$41.6M net +12.9
received +$72.8M+$70.4M ± $99M expected surplus · +$16.0M realized received 16.4 ± 12 expected · 15.9 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TEX's 2000 odds 1% → 1% (-0.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Justin ThompsonP·27y·L/L
+$34.4M+$34.4M± $25M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 5.7± 3 exp WARrealized -0.2
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.26/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.8/yr over 2.2 seasons
Talent
1.90/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
Gabe KaplerOF·25y·R/R
+$20.8M+$20.8M± $43M exp surplusrealized +$0.8M 5.3± 5 exp WARrealized 1.5
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.42/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.9/yr over 0.9 season
Talent
1.05/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
Francisco CorderoP·25y·R/R
+$6.4M+$6.4M± $45M exp surplusrealized +$14.4M 2.0± 6 exp WARrealized 7.9
Prior
BA #29 pedigree (2000) → 0.64/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.0/yr over 0.7 season
Talent
0.40/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
Alan WebbP·21y·L/L
+$4.8M+$2.4M± $62M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 8 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#115 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Frank CatalanottoOF·26y·L/R
+$4.0M+$4.0M± $34M exp surplusrealized +$4.0M 1.4± 4 exp WARrealized 5.5
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.5/yr over 1.1 season
Talent
0.36/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
Bill HaselmanC·34y·R/R
+$2.4M+$2.4M± $16M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 0.7± 2 exp WARrealized 1.2
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.27/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.7/yr over 1.1 season
Talent
0.46/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs × 0.73 age decline
DETDET Randy Smith net −$41.6M net -12.9
received +$22.4M−$5.6M ± $38M expected surplus · −$25.6M realized received 6.1 ± 5 expected · 3.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved DET's 2000 odds 24% → 26% (+2.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Juan GonzálezOF·31y·R/R
+$16.0M−$12.0M± $15M exp surplusrealized −$10.4M 3.9± 2 exp WARrealized 1.7
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 3.8/yr over 2.6 seasons
Talent
2.65/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.98 age decline
Danny PattersonP·29y·R/R
+$4.8M+$4.8M± $23M exp surplusrealized −$15.2M 1.3± 3 exp WARrealized 1.3
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.6/yr over 2.1 seasons
Talent
0.48/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs × 0.91 age decline
Gregg ZaunC·29y·B/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $26M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.9± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.4/yr over 1.2 season
Talent
0.31/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs × 0.73 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →