Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
December 11, 2014

MIALAD

MIA won this trade +$54.4M surplus MIA won this trade +2.8 WAR
MIAMIA Dan Jennings net +$54.4M net +2.8
received +$46.4M+$46.4M ± $55M expected surplus · +$84.8M realized received 10.4 ± 7 expected · 18.5 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved MIA's 2015 odds 1% → 4% (+2.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Dee Strange-Gordon2B·27y·L/R
+$44.8M+$44.8M± $26M exp surplusrealized +$62.4M 7.4± 3 exp WARrealized 8.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.1/yr over 1.5 season
Talent
2.48/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
Dan HarenP·35y·R/R
+$0.8M+$0.8M± $12M exp surplusrealized −$8.8M 2.0± 2 exp WARrealized 1.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.8/yr over 2.8 seasons
Talent
2.03/yr blended
Horizon
1.0 control yr
Miguel RojasSS·26y·R/R
+$0.8M+$0.8M± $47M exp surplusrealized +$31.2M 1.0± 6 exp WARrealized 9.4
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.1/yr over 0.6 season
Talent
0.19/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.95 age decline
LADLAD Ned Colletti net −$54.4M net -2.8
received +$25.6M+$25.6M ± $93M expected surplus · +$30.4M realized received 8.3 ± 12 expected · 15.7 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved LAD's 2015 odds 94% → 84% (-9.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Enrique HernándezOF·24y·R/R
+$19.2M+$19.2M± $53M exp surplusrealized +$13.6M 4.9± 7 exp WARrealized 6.5
Prior
#191 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 3.8/yr over 0.3 season
Talent
0.89/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Andrew HeaneyP·24y·L/L
+$4.8M+$4.8M± $50M exp surplusrealized −$6.4M 1.8± 6 exp WARrealized 1.1
Prior
#9 overall draft pick → 0.73/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.7/yr over 0.5 season
Talent
0.34/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Austin BarnesC·26y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $55M exp surplusrealized +$25.6M 1.1± 7 exp WARrealized 8.1
Prior
#283 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.96 age decline
Chris HatcherP·30y·B/R
+$0.0M+$0.0M± $16M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 0.5± 2 exp WARrealized -0.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.4/yr over 1.9 season
Talent
0.31/yr blended
Horizon
4.4 control yrs × 0.36 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →