Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
December 14, 2007

OAKARI

ARI won this trade +$76.0M surplus OAK won this trade +0.8 WAR
OAKOAK Billy Beane net −$76.0M net +0.8
received +$39.2M+$39.2M ± $132M expected surplus · +$81.6M realized received 13.1 ± 16 expected · 16.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved OAK's 2008 odds 7% → 5% (-1.9 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Carlos González#22OF·23y·L/L
+$20.0M+$20.0M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$4.8M 5.1± 7 exp WARrealized 1.0
Prior
BA #22 prospect (2008) → 0.94/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.94/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Brett Anderson#36P·20y·L/L
+$14.4M+$14.4M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$64.8M 3.9± 7 exp WARrealized 11.5
Prior
BA #36 prospect (2008) → 0.71/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.71/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Aaron CunninghamOF·22y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$3.2M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized -0.3
Prior
#185 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Chris Carter1B/DH·22y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#455 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Greg SmithP·25y·L/L
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$6.4M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized 1.4
Prior
#171 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Dana EvelandP·25y·L/L
+$0.0M+$0.0M± $27M exp surplusrealized +$11.2M 0.5± 3 exp WARrealized 2.5
Prior
#469 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.1/yr over 1.1 season
Talent
0.16/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
ARIARI Josh Byrnes net +$76.0M net -0.8
received +$7.2M+$7.2M ± $45M expected surplus · +$157.6M realized received 4.4 ± 6 expected · 15.3 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved ARI's 2008 odds 9% → 12% (+3.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Dan HarenP·28y·R/R
+$8.0M+$8.0M± $15M exp surplusrealized +$159.2M 3.7± 2 exp WARrealized 15.4
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 3.5/yr over 2.5 seasons
Talent
2.46/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr
Connor RobertsonP·27y·R/R
−$0.8M−$0.8M± $42M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 0.7± 5 exp WARrealized -0.1
Prior
#937 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.1/yr over 0.2 season
Talent
0.16/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.76 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →