Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
July 23, 2003

CHCPIT

CHC won this trade +$76.0M surplus CHC won this trade +28.0 WAR
CHCCHC Jim Hendry net +$76.0M net +28.0
received +$26.4M+$26.4M ± $34M expected surplus · +$68.8M realized received 5.0 ± 4 expected · 27.8 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CHC's 2003 odds 31% → 47% (+15.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Kenny LoftonOF·36y·L/L
+$17.6M+$17.6M± $12M exp surplusrealized +$13.6M 2.6± 2 exp WARrealized 2.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 3.5/yr over 2.6 seasons
Talent
2.43/yr blended
Horizon
1.1 control yr × 0.99 age decline
Aramis Ramírez3B·25y·R/R
+$8.8M+$8.8M± $31M exp surplusrealized +$55.2M 2.4± 4 exp WARrealized 25.7
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.9/yr over 1.9 season
Talent
0.61/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
PITPIT Dave Littlefield net −$76.0M net -28.0
received +$36.8M+$32.0M ± $82M expected surplus · −$7.2M realized received 7.4 ± 10 expected · -0.2 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved PIT's 2003 odds 12% → 7% (-5.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
José Hernández3B/SS·34y·R/R
+$17.6M+$16.8M± $14M exp surplusrealized −$4.0M 2.6± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.5/yr over 2.7 seasons
Talent
1.81/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.95 age decline
Bobby Hill2B/3B·25y·B/R
+$12.8M+$12.8M± $52M exp surplusrealized −$3.2M 3.5± 6 exp WARrealized -0.2
Prior
BA #48 pedigree (2002) → 0.47/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.1/yr over 0.4 season
Talent
0.63/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Matt BrubackP·24y·R/R
+$6.4M+$2.4M± $62M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 8 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#1367 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →