Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
November 28, 2014

TOROAK

TOR won this trade +$194.4M surplus TOR won this trade +17.8 WAR
TORTOR Alex Anthopoulos net +$194.4M net +17.8
received +$136.8M+$136.8M ± $30M expected surplus · +$204.0M realized received 13.7 ± 4 expected · 21.0 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TOR's 2015 odds 60% → 89% (+28.8 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Josh Donaldson3B·30y·R/R
+$136.8M+$136.8M± $30M exp surplusrealized +$204.0M 13.7± 4 exp WARrealized 21.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 5.8/yr over 1.9 season
Talent
3.60/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs × 0.95 age decline
OAKOAK Billy Beane net −$194.4M net -17.8
received +$40.0M+$40.0M ± $97M expected surplus · +$9.6M realized received 9.4 ± 12 expected · 3.2 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved OAK's 2015 odds 9% → 2% (-7.4 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Brett Lawrie2B/3B·25y·R/R
+$32.0M+$32.0M± $26M exp surplusrealized +$1.6M 5.3± 3 exp WARrealized 0.9
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.30/yr
Evidence
recent form 3.1/yr over 1.4 season
Talent
1.77/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs
Franklin Barreto#862B/SS·19y·R/R
+$8.0M+$8.0M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$5.6M 2.4± 7 exp WARrealized -1.0
Prior
BA #86 prospect (2015) → 0.43/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.43/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Kendall GravemanP·25y·R/R
+$2.4M+$2.4M± $52M exp surplusrealized +$12.8M 1.3± 6 exp WARrealized 3.2
Prior
#235 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.3/yr over 0.3 season
Talent
0.23/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Sean NolinP·26y·L/L
−$2.4M−$2.4M± $51M exp surplusrealized +$0.8M 0.4± 6 exp WARrealized 0.1
Prior
#186 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -1.4/yr over 0.1 season
Talent
0.07/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.91 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →