Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
December 8, 2009 · 3-team trade

DETARINYY

DET won this trade +$248.8M surplus DET won this trade +23.9 WAR
DETDET Dave Dombrowski net +$248.8M net +23.9
received +$68.8M+$68.8M ± $84M expected surplus · +$360.8M realized received 13.5 ± 10 expected · 41.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved DET's 2010 odds 31% → 52% (+21.5 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Max ScherzerP·26y·R/R
+$56.0M+$56.0M± $32M exp surplusrealized +$204.0M 8.8± 4 exp WARrealized 22.2
Prior
#11 overall draft pick → 0.47/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.2/yr over 1.6 season
Talent
2.20/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
Austin Jackson#76OF·23y·R/R
+$8.0M+$8.0M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$154.4M 2.5± 7 exp WARrealized 16.5
Prior
BA #76 prospect (2010) → 0.45/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.45/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Phil CokeP·28y·L/L
+$2.4M+$2.4M± $30M exp surplusrealized +$8.8M 1.0± 4 exp WARrealized 3.5
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.3/yr over 1.5 season
Talent
0.27/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs × 0.88 age decline
Daniel SchlerethP·24y·L/L
+$2.4M+$2.4M± $42M exp surplusrealized −$6.4M 1.2± 5 exp WARrealized -0.8
Prior
#26 overall draft pick → 0.39/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.1/yr over 1.0 season
Talent
0.24/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
ARIARI Josh Byrnes net −$144.0M net -11.5
received +$7.2M+$1.6M ± $41M expected surplus · +$53.6M realized received 3.5 ± 5 expected · 9.9 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved ARI's 2010 odds 3% → 2% (-0.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Ian KennedyP·26y·R/R
+$4.0M+$4.0M± $38M exp surplusrealized +$55.2M 1.3± 5 exp WARrealized 8.5
Prior
BA #45 pedigree (2008) → 0.55/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.1/yr over 0.6 season
Talent
0.32/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
Edwin JacksonP·27y·R/R
+$3.2M−$2.4M± $15M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 2.2± 2 exp WARrealized 1.4
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.1/yr over 2.5 seasons
Talent
1.46/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr
NYYNYY Brian Cashman net −$104.8M net -12.4
received +$47.2M+$47.2M ± $18M expected surplus · +$113.6M realized received 5.9 ± 2 expected · 16.1 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved NYY's 2010 odds 91% → 82% (-8.9 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Curtis GrandersonOF·29y·L/R
+$47.2M+$47.2M± $18M exp surplusrealized +$113.6M 5.9± 2 exp WARrealized 16.1
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 4.3/yr over 2.4 seasons
Talent
2.95/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →