Rosternomics
← Trade Database
July 5, 2014

CHCOAK

CHC won this trade +$59.2M surplus CHC won this trade +9.9 WAR
CHCCHC Theo Epstein net +$59.2M net +9.9
received +$72.0M+$72.0M ± $68M expected surplus · +$76.0M realized received 14.8 ± 8 expected · 11.8 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CHC's 2014 odds 28% → 21% (-7.6 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Addison RussellSS·20y·R/R
+$29.4M+$29.4M± $48M exp surplusrealized +$76.0M 7.8± 6 exp WARrealized 11.7
Prior
Composite #14.0 prospect (Baseball America #14 (2014)) → 1.41/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
1.41/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Dan StrailyP·25y·R/R
+$29.3M+$29.3M± $44M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 4.3± 6 exp WARrealized 0.1
Prior
#723 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.6/yr over 1.1 season
Talent
0.86/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
Billy McKinneyOF·19y·L/L
+$13.0M+$13.0M± $19M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 2.7± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#24 overall draft pick → 0.50/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.50/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
OAKOAK Billy Beane net −$59.2M net -9.9
received +$22.4M+$22.4M ± $21M expected surplus · +$16.8M realized received 4.0 ± 3 expected · 1.9 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved OAK's 2014 odds 28% → 37% (+8.9 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Jeff SamardzijaP·29y·R/R
+$17.1M+$17.1M± $18M exp surplusrealized +$22.4M 2.8± 2 exp WARrealized 2.2
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.0/yr over 2.4 seasons
Talent
1.41/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs
Jason HammelP·31y·R/R
+$5.5M+$5.5M± $11M exp surplusrealized −$5.6M 1.2± 1 exp WARrealized -0.3
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.7/yr over 2.4 seasons
Talent
1.20/yr blended
Horizon
1.0 control yr

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.