Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
July 5, 2014

CHCOAK

CHC won this trade +$73.6M surplus CHC won this trade +9.9 WAR
CHCCHC Jed Hoyer net +$73.6M net +9.9
received +$56.0M+$56.0M ± $90M expected surplus · +$80.8M realized received 14.4 ± 11 expected · 11.8 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CHC's 2014 odds 29% → 21% (-7.6 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Addison Russell#14SS·20y·R/R
+$32.0M+$32.0M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$80.8M 7.8± 7 exp WARrealized 11.7
Prior
BA #14 prospect (2014) → 1.41/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
1.41/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Dan StrailyP·26y·R/R
+$15.2M+$15.2M± $40M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 3.9± 5 exp WARrealized 0.1
Prior
#723 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.3/yr over 1.3 season
Talent
0.78/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
Billy McKinneyOF·20y·L/L
+$8.8M+$8.8M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 2.7± 7 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#24 overall draft pick → 0.50/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.50/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
OAKOAK Billy Beane net −$73.6M net -9.9
received +$10.4M+$10.4M ± $22M expected surplus · +$7.2M realized received 3.8 ± 3 expected · 1.9 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved OAK's 2014 odds 28% → 37% (+8.9 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Jeff SamardzijaP·29y·R/R
+$8.8M+$8.8M± $18M exp surplusrealized +$12.8M 2.7± 2 exp WARrealized 2.2
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.9/yr over 2.5 seasons
Talent
1.35/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs
Jason HammelP·32y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $12M exp surplusrealized −$5.6M 1.1± 2 exp WARrealized -0.3
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.5/yr over 2.7 seasons
Talent
1.09/yr blended
Horizon
1.0 control yr

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →