Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
July 9, 2010

TEXSEA

TEX won this trade +$12.0M surplus TEX won this trade +1.8 WAR
TEXTEX Jon Daniels net +$12.0M net +1.8
received +$34.4M+$14.4M ± $24M expected surplus · +$9.6M realized received 5.8 ± 3 expected · 3.5 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TEX's 2010 odds 31% → 49% (+17.8 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Cliff LeeP·32y·L/L
+$31.2M+$11.2M± $15M exp surplusrealized +$15.2M 4.8± 2 exp WARrealized 3.2
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 4.6/yr over 2.7 seasons
Talent
3.24/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.98 age decline
Mark LoweP·27y·L/R
+$3.2M+$3.2M± $18M exp surplusrealized −$5.6M 1.0± 2 exp WARrealized 0.3
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.6/yr over 2.0 seasons
Talent
0.48/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs
SEASEA Jack Zduriencik net −$12.0M net -1.8
received +$50.4M+$48.0M ± $116M expected surplus · −$2.4M realized received 13.6 ± 14 expected · 1.7 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved SEA's 2010 odds 1% → 1% (-0.6 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Justin Smoak#131B·24y·B/L
+$32.0M+$32.0M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$6.4M 7.9± 7 exp WARrealized 0.2
Prior
BA #13 prospect (2010) → 1.45/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
1.45/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Blake BeavanP·21y·R/R
+$12.0M+$12.0M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$4.0M 3.3± 7 exp WARrealized 1.3
Prior
#17 overall draft pick → 0.60/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.60/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Matt Lawson2B·25y·R/R
+$4.8M+$2.4M± $62M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 8 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#440 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Josh LuekeP·26y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $54M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.1± 7 exp WARrealized 0.2
Prior
#500 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.94 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →