Rosternomics
← Trade Database
June 27, 1997

OAKBAL

OAK won this trade +$33.6M surplus OAK won this trade +4.1 WAR
OAKOAK Sandy Alderson net +$33.6M net +4.1
received +$7.2M+$7.2M ± $38M expected surplus · +$17.6M realized received 2.9 ± 5 expected · 3.7 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved OAK's 1997 odds 0% → 0% (+0.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Jimmy HaynesP·24y·R/R
+$4.8M+$4.8M± $26M exp surplusrealized +$17.6M 1.6± 3 exp WARrealized 3.7
Prior
Composite #38.0 pedigree (Baseball America #38 (1996)) — fell off 1 list since, regressed → 0.34/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.3/yr over 1.0 season
Talent
0.33/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs
Mark SeaverP·22y·R/R
+$2.3M+$2.3M± $28M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 4 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#111 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
BALBAL Pat Gillick net −$33.6M net -4.1
received −$2.4M−$11.2M ± $15M expected surplus · −$16.0M realized received 2.1 ± 2 expected · -0.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved BAL's 1997 odds 69% → 61% (-7.8 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Gerónimo BerroaDH/OF·32y·R/R
−$2.6M−$11.4M± $15M exp surplusrealized −$16.0M 2.1± 2 exp WARrealized -0.4
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.3/yr over 2.0 seasons
Talent
1.48/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.96 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (composite top-100 rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± figure is a historically calibrated predictive standard deviation, measuring how widely comparable forecasts have missed around their expected value. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.