Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
July 26, 2008

PITNYY

PIT won this trade +$36.8M surplus PIT won this trade +6.0 WAR
PITPIT Neal Huntington net +$36.8M net +6.0
received +$13.6M+$13.6M ± $100M expected surplus · +$3.2M realized received 6.0 ± 12 expected · 6.9 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved PIT's 2008 odds 0% → 0% (-0 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
José Tábata#37OF·20y·R/R
+$14.4M+$14.4M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$2.4M 3.9± 7 exp WARrealized 2.2
Prior
BA #37 prospect (2008) → 0.70/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.70/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Daniel McCutchenP·26y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $54M exp surplusrealized −$8.0M 1.1± 7 exp WARrealized -0.9
Prior
#380 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.94 age decline
Ross OhlendorfP·26y·R/R
+$0.8M+$0.8M± $49M exp surplusrealized +$4.0M 1.0± 6 exp WARrealized 1.9
Prior
#116 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.1/yr over 0.4 season
Talent
0.19/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.93 age decline
Jeff KarstensP·26y·R/R
−$3.2M−$3.2M± $36M exp surplusrealized +$9.6M 0.0± 4 exp WARrealized 3.7
Prior
#574 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.3/yr over 0.8 season
Talent
-0.01/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
NYYNYY Brian Cashman net −$36.8M net -6.0
received −$17.6M−$17.6M ± $21M expected surplus · −$33.6M realized received 1.4 ± 3 expected · 0.9 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved NYY's 2008 odds 29% → 32% (+2.8 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Dámaso MarteP·33y·L/L
−$7.2M−$7.2M± $14M exp surplusrealized −$17.6M 0.8± 2 exp WARrealized 0.3
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.8/yr over 2.7 seasons
Talent
0.62/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.90 age decline
Xavier NadyOF·30y·R/R
−$10.4M−$10.4M± $15M exp surplusrealized −$16.0M 0.6± 2 exp WARrealized 0.6
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.6/yr over 1.9 season
Talent
0.46/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.93 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →