Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
January 21, 2002 · 3-team trade

MILNYMCOL

MIL won this trade +$52.0M surplus MIL won this trade +2.8 WAR
MILMIL Dean Taylor net +$52.0M net +2.8
received +$2.4M+$1.6M ± $22M expected surplus · +$17.6M realized received 4.0 ± 3 expected · 6.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved MIL's 2002 odds 0% → 0% (+0.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Glendon RuschP·28y·L/L
+$6.4M+$6.4M± $15M exp surplusrealized +$17.6M 2.8± 2 exp WARrealized 4.6
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.8/yr over 2.2 seasons
Talent
1.89/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr
Alex OchoaOF·30y·R/R
−$0.8M−$1.6M± $15M exp surplusrealized −$1.6M 1.2± 2 exp WARrealized 1.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.2/yr over 2.2 seasons
Talent
0.86/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.96 age decline
Lenny Harris3B·38y·L/R
−$3.2M−$3.2M± $0M exp surplusrealized +$1.6M 0.0± 0 exp WARrealized 0.8
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.5/yr over 2.2 seasons
Talent
-0.21/yr blended
Horizon
0.0 control yr
NYMNYM Steve Phillips net −$31.2M net -1.2
received −$27.2M−$30.4M ± $73M expected surplus · −$34.4M realized received 5.4 ± 9 expected · 3.6 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved NYM's 2002 odds 8% → 7% (-0.7 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Jeff D'AmicoP·27y·R/R
+$2.4M+$0.8M± $16M exp surplusrealized +$2.4M 1.4± 2 exp WARrealized 1.4
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.34/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.4/yr over 1.6 season
Talent
0.93/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr
Lou CollierSS·29y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $21M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.6± 3 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.4/yr over 0.8 season
Talent
0.28/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs
Mark Sweeney1B/OF·33y·L/L
+$0.8M−$0.8M± $13M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.2± 2 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.1/yr over 1.2 season
Talent
0.18/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.67 age decline
Craig HouseP·25y·R/R
−$3.2M−$3.2M± $39M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.0± 5 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#370 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -0.8/yr over 0.3 season
Talent
-0.01/yr blended
Horizon
4.0 control yrs
Ross Gload1B·26y·L/L
−$4.0M−$4.0M± $52M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 0.1± 6 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#396 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form -2.9/yr over 0.1 season
Talent
0.02/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs × 0.91 age decline
Jeromy BurnitzOF·33y·L/R
−$24.8M−$24.8M± $14M exp surplusrealized −$36.8M 3.1± 2 exp WARrealized 2.2
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.25/yr
Evidence
recent form 3.0/yr over 2.6 seasons
Talent
2.13/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.97 age decline
COLCOL Daniel O'Dowd net −$20.8M net -1.6
received −$8.8M−$8.8M ± $23M expected surplus · −$22.4M realized received 2.2 ± 3 expected · -0.6 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved COL's 2002 odds 0% → 0% (-0.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Benny AgbayaniOF·31y·R/R
+$5.6M+$5.6M± $22M exp surplusrealized −$3.2M 1.5± 3 exp WARrealized -0.3
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.1/yr over 1.4 season
Talent
0.66/yr blended
Horizon
3.0 control yrs × 0.77 age decline
Todd Zeile3B·37y·R/R
−$14.4M−$14.4M± $8M exp surplusrealized −$19.2M 0.7± 1 exp WARrealized -0.3
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 1.9/yr over 2.8 seasons
Talent
1.36/yr blended
Horizon
0.6 control yr

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →