Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
July 29, 2009

PHICLE

CLE won this trade +$20.0M surplus PHI won this trade +0.8 WAR
PHIPHI Ruben Amaro net −$20.0M net +0.8
received +$82.4M+$65.6M ± $43M expected surplus · +$109.6M realized received 11.5 ± 5 expected · 23.5 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved PHI's 2009 odds 46% → 65% (+19.1 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Cliff LeeP·31y·L/L
+$63.2M+$46.4M± $15M exp surplusrealized +$109.6M 6.7± 2 exp WARrealized 22.8
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 3.5/yr over 2.6 seasons
Talent
4.52/yr blended
Horizon
1.5 control yr × 0.99 age decline
Ben FranciscoOF·28y·R/R
+$19.2M+$19.2M± $41M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 4.8± 5 exp WARrealized 0.7
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 2.1/yr over 0.9 season
Talent
1.02/yr blended
Horizon
5.0 control yrs × 0.93 age decline
CLECLE Mark Shapiro net +$20.0M net -0.8
received +$34.4M+$33.6M ± $118M expected surplus · +$129.6M realized received 10.3 ± 15 expected · 22.7 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved CLE's 2009 odds 4% → 2% (-2.3 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Carlos Carrasco#52P·22y·R/R
+$11.2M+$11.2M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$151.2M 3.2± 7 exp WARrealized 25.5
Prior
BA #52 prospect (2009) → 0.58/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.58/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Lou MarsonC·23y·R/R
+$11.2M+$11.2M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$22.4M 3.2± 7 exp WARrealized -3.4
Prior
BA #66 pedigree (2009) → 0.47/yr
Evidence
recent form 19.3/yr over 0.0 season
Talent
0.59/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Jason Donald#692B/SS·25y·R/R
+$8.8M+$8.8M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$0.8M 2.6± 7 exp WARrealized 0.6
Prior
BA #69 prospect (2009) → 0.47/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.47/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Jason KnappP·19y·R/R
+$3.2M+$2.4M± $62M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 8 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#71 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →