Rosternomics
← Trade Database
Share on 𝕏
July 31, 2007

TEXATL

TEX won this trade +$101.6M surplus TEX won this trade +36.5 WAR
TEXTEX Jon Daniels net +$101.6M net +36.5
received +$36.0M+$34.4M ± $131M expected surplus · +$113.6M realized received 11.3 ± 16 expected · 42.4 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved TEX's 2007 odds 4% → 2% (-1.7 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Jarrod Saltalamacchia#36C·22y·B/R
+$14.4M+$14.4M± $58M exp surplusrealized −$3.2M 3.9± 7 exp WARrealized -0.0
Prior
BA #36 prospect (2007) → 0.71/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.71/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Elvis Andrus#65SS·19y·R/R
+$8.8M+$8.8M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$107.2M 2.6± 7 exp WARrealized 29.8
Prior
BA #65 prospect (2007) → 0.48/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.48/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Matt Harrison#90P·22y·L/L
+$7.2M+$7.2M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$0.8M 2.3± 7 exp WARrealized 7.9
Prior
BA #90 prospect (2007) → 0.42/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.42/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
Beau JonesP·21y·L/L
+$4.0M+$2.4M± $62M exp surplusrealized +$0.0M 1.3± 8 exp WARrealized 0.0
Prior
#41 overall draft pick — at the league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
6.0 control yrs
Neftalí FelizP·19y·R/R
+$1.6M+$1.6M± $58M exp surplusrealized +$8.8M 1.2± 7 exp WARrealized 4.7
Prior
no pedigree — league baseline → 0.21/yr
Evidence
no MLB track record — leans on pedigree
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
5.5 control yrs
ATLATL John Schuerholz net −$101.6M net -36.5
received +$44.0M+$44.0M ± $22M expected surplus · +$12.0M realized received 5.9 ± 3 expected · 5.9 realized WAR
Playoff odds: this deal moved ATL's 2007 odds 28% → 43% (+15.2 pts) — how trade timing is graded ↗
receives — most valuable first
Mark Teixeira1B·27y·B/R
+$45.6M+$45.6M± $18M exp surplusrealized +$12.8M 5.7± 2 exp WARrealized 5.6
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.31/yr
Evidence
recent form 4.2/yr over 2.3 seasons
Talent
2.85/yr blended
Horizon
2.0 control yrs
Ron MahayP·36y·L/L
−$1.6M−$1.6M± $12M exp surplusrealized −$0.8M 0.2± 2 exp WARrealized 0.3
Prior
league baseline (track record outweighs draft pedigree) → 0.21/yr
Evidence
recent form 0.2/yr over 2.7 seasons
Talent
0.21/yr blended
Horizon
1.1 control yr × 0.91 age decline

Each player is valued on what he was expected to produce at the time of the trade, versus what he actually produced for his new team.

Expected WAR blends a player's pedigree (Baseball America rank / draft slot, or a baseline) with his recent track record, projected over the years of team control acquired. The ± band is the uncertainty — wide for unproven prospects, tight for established veterans. Surplus values that production at the FA market price of a win (~$8M/WAR) minus salary — so cost-controlled players carry large surplus and expensive ones little, even at the same WAR. Who won is descriptive, not a skill claim: ~99% of a trade's outcome is unforeseeable at the time.

Historically these expected values are unbiased and land within ±2 WAR of reality 75% of the time — yet the side the model favors actually comes out ahead only 53% of the time. The grade is a calibrated bet, not a prediction. Why trades are an efficient market →